Bug #2346
Update File - submissions form
0%
Issue #1:
a. the field (الوحدة الفرعية) should be exist on the Open file and Update file Forms
b. the field (تاريخ تغيير حالة السكن) should be exist on the Open file and Update file Forms
c. the actions (Add) and (Delete) should act and their positions be identical in both of Open file and Update file Forms
Issue #2:
the attached files before, should be preserved and previewed on the attachments tab successfully
Issue #3:
All the fields should retrieve the data successfully
Issue #1:
a. the field (الوحدة الفرعية) is NOT exist in the update file and exist in the Open file evidence 33a.gif
b. the field (تاريخ تغيير حالة السكن) is exist in the update file and NOT exist in the Open file evidence 33b.gif
c.
>>the action (add) is enabled in the update file and disabled on the Open file, although both forms are created for (ربات بيوت) status !
>>Action (delete) is available for each record in the table in Update file and is global for all the table on the Open file form
Observe evidence 33c.gif
Issue #2:
All the attachments will be lost once the file is browsed to be updated ! evidence 34.gif
Issue #3:
all the fields' values are missed as on the evidence 35.gif
Description
Issue #1:
1. Open the file with Civil ID (#265091900285) from update file service.
2. Observe the following differences between the (update file form) and (Open file form)
a.(بيانات العنوان) tab, (الوحدة الفرعية) field
b.(بيانات الحالة) tab, (تاريخ تغيير حالة السكن) field,
c.(بيانات الحالة) tab, (add) and (delete) actions
Issue #2:
1. From the opened file in issue #1, open the attachment tab
2. Observe the attached files in the (attachments) tab
Issue #3:
1. Open the file with Civil ID (#301011001331/2144886003) from update file service.
2. Observe the fields' values in the (بيانات العنوان) tab
Enhancement notes:
1. the files selection should be inside the service not outside it !
at least the files could be selected after select the service.
History
#1 Updated by Mohannad Sabra over 4 years ago
- Assignee changed from Mohannad Sabra to Saja Nakhleh
Issue #1:
all the differences between the two screens is according to the business requirements
a. in the update file the subunit is the same one in the screen and the main unit in the open file is only for filtration.
b. this date is optional and used in case the user has changed the accommodation type to be used later in case its entered.
c. in the open file since there is no members added then the delete is not visible but in update since the member is there the delete will be to the selected member.
Issue #2:
the attachments is connected to the transaction number and since we didnt save the number until the submit so when ever the user change the transaction all the data is removed.
Issue #3:
in the deceased case the address data will not be retrieved unless the data was already stored in the database.
#2 Updated by Saja Nakhleh over 4 years ago
- File 36.png added
- Status changed from Open to Feedback
- Assignee changed from Saja Nakhleh to Mohannad Sabra
Issue #1:
a. verified.
b. verified.
c. enable/disable issue is verified, but the positioning issue need design review
Issue #2:
could the attachments be connected to more stable primary key ? (i.e: Civil ID)
as the update action should preserve the old data to be edited if needed (as add action or delete action)
Issue #3:
verified as invalid issue
New Issue ـ issue #4:
1. from (بيانات الحالة), select ايقاف
2. from ( researcher decision) select the first option (ايقاف من تاريخ * و ذلك بسبب *)
3. Observe the options in the drop down list
result:
the options have some spelling mistakes as shown on the attached evidence 36.png
Note: the same issue is occurred on the (المشرف) step
Issue #5:
1. Open the file of the ID: 265091900285
2. select update file service
3. enter the serial number and click (تحقق الافراد مع بيانات الربط )
4. Observe the occurred Exception message as on the recorded video:
https://www.loom.com/share/787274b106a24eb594ff6f1efcd0eef6
Issue #6:
1. 1. Open the file of the ID: 265120100464/2121013005
2. select update file service
3. enter the serial number and click (تحقق الافراد مع بيانات الربط )
4. Observe the mandatory fields
results:
1.the fields (سبب استمرار ايقاف) (تاريخ الايقاف) (الى تاريخ) (وصف الحالة الاجتماعية ) are mandatory but not marked with red star
2. وصف الحالة الاجتماعية should contain the option: متوفى , evidence 37.gif
Issue #7:
once the serial number is not submitted then the submission form will not validate it and the file will not appear after submission
scenario and results are recoded in the following video:
https://www.loom.com/share/25fc4e5ba865408784950908718510b7
Issue #8:
the update reason should be entered from 1 place, the current behaviour the update reason will be entered twice by the researcher:
from the (اجراءات الملف) tab and رأي الباحث tab. evidence 77.gif
Issue #9:
1. 1. Open the file of the ID: 301011001331
2. select update file service
3. enter the serial number and click (تحقق الافراد مع بيانات الربط )
4. NAvigate to the (بيانات الحالة) tab
result:
an exception will be occurred as on the following vedio and evidence 78.jpeg
https://www.loom.com/share/f304dfaf55204a41aabb217213deef4a
Issue #10:
1. Open the file of the ID: 290042800055/2086832108
2. select update file service
3. enter the serial number and click (تحقق الافراد مع بيانات الربط )
4. Navigate to the (اجراءات الملف) tab and select stop
result: Null exception will be occurred as on evidence 89.gif
Issue #11:
1. Open the file of the ID: 290042800055/2086832108
2. select update file service
3. enter the serial number and fill all the mandatory fields
4. navigate to the (researcher decision) tab and select the option(استمرار الملف إلى تاريخ * مع استرجاع ما صرف عن الفترة من إلى و سبب الاسترجاع مع صرف مستحق عن الفترة من إلى و سبب الاستحقاق **.)
results: the dates should be validated, hence the end dates should be after the starts dates. evidence 90.gif
#3 Updated by Saja Nakhleh over 4 years ago
- File 37.gif added
#4 Updated by Mohannad Sabra over 4 years ago
- Status changed from Feedback to Open
- Assignee changed from Mohannad Sabra to Musab Khuraisat
- Priority changed from Normal to High
Dear Musab,
Kindly check the last bug in the last message in the thread as below:
New Issue ـ issue #4:
1. from (بيانات الحالة), select ايقاف
2. from ( researcher decision) select the first option (ايقاف من تاريخ * و ذلك بسبب *)
3. Observe the options in the drop down list
result:
the options have some spelling mistakes as shown on the attached evidence 36.png
Note: the same issue is occurred on the (المشرف) step
Issue #5:
1. Open the file of the ID: 265091900285
2. select update file service
3. enter the serial number and click (تحقق الافراد مع بيانات الربط )
4. Observe the occurred Exception message as on the recorded video:
https://www.loom.com/share/787274b106a24eb594ff6f1efcd0eef6
Issue #6:
1. 1. Open the file of the ID: 301011001331
2. select update file service
3. enter the serial number and click (تحقق الافراد مع بيانات الربط )
4. Observe the mandatory fields
results:
1.the fields (سبب استمرار ايقاف) (تاريخ الايقاف) (الى تاريخ) (وصف الحالة الاجتماعية ) are mandatory but not marked with red star
2. وصف الحالة الاجتماعية should contain the option: متوفى , evidence 37.gif
Issue #7:
once the serial number is not submitted then the submission form will not validate it and the file will not appear after submission
scenario and results are recoded in the following video:
https://www.loom.com/share/25fc4e5ba865408784950908718510b7
#5 Updated by Saja Nakhleh about 4 years ago
- File 77.gif added
#6 Updated by Saja Nakhleh about 4 years ago
- File 78.JPG added
#7 Updated by Saja Nakhleh about 4 years ago
- File 89.GIF added
#8 Updated by Saja Nakhleh about 4 years ago
- File 90.GIF added
#9 Updated by Musab Khuraisat about 4 years ago
Done.
#10 Updated by Musab Khuraisat about 4 years ago
- Assignee changed from Musab Khuraisat to Saja Nakhleh
Done.
#11 Updated by Saja Nakhleh about 4 years ago
- File 103.gif added
- Status changed from Open to Feedback
- Assignee changed from Saja Nakhleh to Musab Khuraisat
Issue #2:
Verified as technical limitation on the attachments module
Issue #4:
tested and verified.
Issue #5:
tested and verified.
Issue #6:
a. tested and verified.
b. Still duplicated . observe evidence 103.gif
Issue #7:
Still duplicated.
https://www.loom.com/share/25fc4e5ba865408784950908718510b7
Issue #8:
still duplicated, the searcher opinion should be compared with the selected values on the (اجراءات الملف) tab and be the same values.
observe attachment 77.gif
Issue #9:
tested and verified for another deceased case : 298110900899/2011931611
Issue #10:
tested and verified.
Issue #11:
still duplicated.
#12 Updated by Musab Khuraisat almost 4 years ago
- Assignee changed from Musab Khuraisat to Saja Nakhleh
Done.
#13 Updated by Saja Nakhleh almost 4 years ago
- Assignee changed from Saja Nakhleh to Musab Khuraisat
Issue #6:
b. verified as died user social status will not retrieved from the same table
Issue #7:
tested and verified.
Issue #8:
tested and verified.
Issue #11:
tested and verified.
New issue #12:
1. open a stopped file (i.e: 299040701134) and select (رفع ايقاف) from اجراءات الملف
2. fill all the mandatory fields and click submit
result: the field value will not be detected ! the scenario and the results are on this vedio:
loom.com/share/780edc71c89443baa21128beaa6868b6
#14 Updated by Musab Khuraisat almost 4 years ago
- Assignee changed from Musab Khuraisat to Saja Nakhleh
issue #12: (Fixed)
#15 Updated by Saja Nakhleh almost 4 years ago
- File 120.GIF added
- Assignee changed from Saja Nakhleh to Musab Khuraisat
#16 Updated by Musab Khuraisat almost 4 years ago
Issue #12: fixed
#17 Updated by Musab Khuraisat almost 4 years ago
Issue #12:fixed
#18 Updated by Musab Khuraisat almost 4 years ago
- Assignee changed from Musab Khuraisat to Saja Nakhleh
Issue #12:fixed
#19 Updated by Saja Nakhleh almost 4 years ago
- Status changed from Feedback to Closed
Issue #13:
tested and verified.